As the Democratic nominee in 1912, Woodrow Wilson attracted attention from a range of African American leaders, drawn by his New Freedom platform, which emphasized opportunity and fairness. Among those taking interest in his campaign were W.E.B. Du Bois, founder of the NAACP and editor of The Crisis magazine, and William Monroe Trotter, civil rights activist and publisher of The Guardian newspaper.

However, Wilson’s policies during his presidency soon led to disappointment among many African American advocates. His administration’s implementation of segregation in federal offices, his decision to screen The Birth of a Nation at the White House in 1915, and his limited engagement with civil rights issues strained his relationship with African American leaders. Figures like Du Bois, who had temporarily supported Wilson despite his past alignment with the Socialist Party, and Trotter, who challenged the president directly, became vocal critics. Wilson’s approach to race and segregation contributed to deepening the systemic racial inequalities that persisted through the 20th century.

When Woodrow Wilson won the presidency in 1912, Washington, D.C. was home to a growing Black middle class, with African Americans making up nearly a third of the city’s population. Despite this progress, segregation and racial inequality shaped life in the nation’s capital, where neighborhoods, schools, and private institutions were divided by race. However, since the Reconstruction era, the federal government had maintained an integrated workforce. By 1912, African Americans comprised at least 10% of federal employees, enabling many to pursue professional careers and support a network of educational and community institutions in Washington, D.C.

Wilson’s administration marked a turning point. As the first Southerner elected president since the Civil War, Wilson and members of his cabinet, many of whom held segregationist views, permitted the introduction of racial segregation into federal agencies. This shift occurred amid a broader national context, as segregation laws in the South were becoming more entrenched and discriminatory practices such as redlining were reinforcing segregation in northern cities.

According to historian Eric Yellin, federal segregation under Wilson was not only about separating Black and white employees; it also curtailed opportunities for Black professional advancement, limiting their access to desirable positions despite their qualifications and success in civil service examinations.

Although Wilson did not issue a formal order mandating segregation, he allowed his cabinet secretaries to implement these policies, rationalizing them as measures to reduce workplace tensions. His stance drew sharp criticism from African American leaders, including activist William Monroe Trotter, who confronted Wilson at the White House in 1914. Trotter protested the administration’s actions, stating:

“We [had] appealed to you to undo this race segregation in accord with your duty as President and with your pre-election pledges to colored American voters. We stated that such segregation was a public humiliation and degradation, and entirely unmerited and far-reaching in its injurious effects.”

The federal segregation policies introduced during Wilson’s presidency contributed to a lasting pattern of racial exclusion in government employment that continued well beyond his administration.

During his presidency, Woodrow Wilson’s enjoyment of modern entertainment became the center of one of the most enduring controversies of his time in office: the private White House screening of D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation in 1915. The screening was significant because it occurred not in a public cinema but within the White House itself—the first time a film had been shown there. The event underscored the film’s perceived cultural and political importance, giving it an air of presidential endorsement that amplified its influence.

The film, an adaptation of Thomas Dixon’s novel The Clansman, presented a distorted and racist version of the Reconstruction era, portraying African Americans as threats to social order and the Ku Klux Klan as heroic defenders of the South. Many historians credit the film with fueling the Klan’s resurgence after World War I.

According to John Milton Cooper Jr. in his biography Woodrow Wilson, the screening took place at the request of Wilson’s old friend and former classmate, Thomas Dixon, who sought the president’s prestige to promote the film. Dixon’s goal was to use the White House as a platform to legitimize the movie’s narrative, which aligned with his own deeply racist ideology. Cooper notes that while Dixon exaggerated the nature of Wilson’s enthusiasm for the film in his promotional materials, the president’s decision to host the screening gave the film a powerful imprimatur.

The screening became infamous due to a quote widely attributed to Wilson, in which he allegedly described the film as “like writing history with lightning. My only regret is that it is all so terribly true.” Cooper and other historians dispute the authenticity of this quote, as it originated from the film’s publicity campaign rather than a verified source. Nevertheless, Cooper emphasizes that Wilson’s own published historical writings, particularly his multi-volume History of the American People, reflected a narrative of Reconstruction that was strikingly similar to the film’s—one that cast the federal government’s post-war policies as oppressive and praised the South’s resistance.

The NAACP, founded in 1909, and other civil rights leaders protested the screening and condemned the quote, demanding that Wilson disavow the film’s racist themes. However, as Cooper highlights, Wilson remained silent, neither confirming the quote nor distancing himself from the film’s portrayal of history. His silence, Cooper argues, was emblematic of a broader pattern: just as he permitted the segregation of the federal workforce under his cabinet's direction without issuing a formal order, Wilson’s inaction in the face of The Birth of a Nation’s impact was a powerful form of complicity.

The White House screening of The Birth of a Nation became a pivotal moment not only in Wilson’s legacy but also in the history of civil rights activism. The protests it sparked represented an early, organized effort to confront both cinematic and political racism, setting a precedent for future challenges to racial injustice in American public life.

Woodrow Wilson’s presidency unfolded during a period of intense national debate over immigration, culminating shortly after he left office with the passage of the 1921 Emergency Quota Act under his successor, Warren G. Harding. This law, followed by the even more restrictive 1924 National Origins Quota Act (also known as the Johnson-Reed Act), marked a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy by imposing strict numerical limits and establishing quotas based on national origin. These quotas were designed to reduce immigration from Asia, Eastern Europe, and Southern Europe, reflecting widespread nativist fears that certain immigrant groups were less capable of assimilating into American society.

While these landmark laws were enacted after his presidency, the debates surrounding immigration policy during Wilson’s administration were part of a broader, long-standing national discourse. Though immigration was a key issue of the Progressive Era, Wilson is not typically remembered for championing a particular immigration policy. His views on the subject reflected the complex political and social tensions of the time. As a Progressive Democrat, Wilson believed that immigration required regulation, especially given the unprecedented numbers of new arrivals during the early 20th century. However, he was also conscious of the political power of immigrant communities, many of whom were integral to Democratic urban political machines, such as Tammany Hall.

Wilson’s most notable engagement with immigration policy came during the legislative battles over literacy tests for new immigrants. In 1915, he vetoed the Burnett Immigration Bill, which sought to impose a literacy test as a condition for entry, arguing that such a measure was unjust. He believed it would exclude individuals seeking opportunity simply because they had been denied access to education in their countries of origin. In his veto message, Wilson stated that a literacy requirement would prevent “illustrious [future] Americans” from contributing to the nation. However, Wilson did not oppose other provisions in the bill, such as a higher head tax on immigrants or restrictions on unskilled laborers.

In 1917, Congress passed a new immigration law that once again included a literacy test, as well as an $8 head tax and the creation of the Asiatic Barred Zone, which prohibited immigration from most of Asia. Wilson vetoed this law as well, again objecting to the literacy test, which he saw as discriminatory and counter to America’s tradition of offering opportunity to those seeking a better life. However, he did not oppose the Asiatic Barred Zone, a stance reflecting the racialized views on immigration that were common at the time. Despite his veto, Congress overrode it, enacting the Immigration Act of 1917 and laying the groundwork for more restrictive policies in the years that followed.

Wilson’s approach to immigration policy shifted during World War I, shaped by concerns over national security. The Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 targeted immigrants, particularly Germans and Eastern and Southern Europeans, suspected of holding anarchist, socialist, or pacifist views. The post-war period, marked by the First Red Scare in 1919, saw heightened anti-immigrant sentiment, culminating in mass deportations, including that of prominent anarchist and feminist Emma Goldman.

Overall, Wilson’s record on immigration reflects the tensions and contradictions of his era. He demonstrated a commitment to certain principles of fairness, such as his opposition to literacy tests, while also supporting racially exclusionary policies, such as the Asiatic Barred Zone. His actions, shaped by the political, social, and security concerns of his time, contributed to a legacy that foreshadowed the more sweeping restrictions enacted in the 1920s.

John Milton Cooper Jr., a distinguished historian and biographer of Woodrow Wilson, provides a nuanced perspective on Wilson's stance toward immigration. In his comprehensive work, Woodrow Wilson: A Biography, Cooper highlights that Wilson, during his presidency, exhibited a complex approach to immigration policy. Notably, Wilson vetoed restrictive immigration legislation, such as the Immigration Act of 1917, which sought to impose literacy tests on new immigrants. Wilson argued that such measures were unjust, as they would deny entry to individuals seeking opportunities, including education, which they had been deprived of in their home countries. However, despite his opposition, Congress overrode his veto, and the act became law. Cooper's analysis suggests that while Wilson opposed certain restrictive measures, his overall stance on immigration was influenced by the prevailing political and social dynamics of his time.

For a more in-depth understanding, you may find this discussion insightful:

Listen to the audiobook preview of John Milton Cooper, Jr.’s book Woodrow Wilson, a Biography